Proposed national business registration
It has been announced that in April 2011 a new national system for business name registrations will commence. Each State of Australia has agreed to refer their business name registration powers to the Federal Government so that a uniform system can be established.
The new system will be administered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission [ASIC] who also control the registration of company names.
Lower registration fees
For those businesses that have registered business names across Australia, it will be welcomed that a new simplified registration system is being introduced which will also significantly reduce registration costs to $30.00 for a one year registration and $70.00 for a three year registration. Costs have been reduced as all registrations will be conducted online.
The new national system will roll over all existing State and Territory business names into the national system. This will result in a large number of duplicated names. Within the computer system there will be a State or Territory designation to differentiate each business name together with, for all new business name registrations a requirement that the applicant must disclose an Australian Business Number [ABN]. Many business name holders will need to decide whether to challenge other operators using an identical business name which passes off as the local registered owner of the business name. Others may if well funded want to buy out similar names to consolidate a position in the market.
The new national system will retain the majority of the provisions of the State based Business Name Acts so that some names cannot be registered if they are offensive, misleading or under a restricted words regulation. An appeal process to challenge a decision of ASIC in allowing a competitor to register a business name or refusal of a business name will be established using the Administrative Appeals Tribunal [AAT]. It is proposed that if an applicant for a business name is dissatisfied that on written request ASIC will complete a review of the decision if requested within 28 days of the initial decision. No fee will apply for this review. If a person is dissatisfied with the outcome of a review, the cost for an appeal to the AAT is $682.00 refunded if successful.
The new system will not affect trade marks, domain names or company names. At present ASIC are developing software to create a search system to help users to identify names. Submissions for additional search criteria to be included in the software can be request over the next few months.
No franchisor consent to lodge a franchisee business name
It will be important for franchise systems to properly understand the new registration system as the registration of a franchisee’s authorised franchise name including the franchisee’s region or location will no longer require the franchisee to provide written permission from the franchisor. Franchisors and any other holder of a registered business name will now need to be diligent in checking ASIC records to establish that only authorised franchisees have franchise business names. ASIC have proposed that within the online system that there may be a registered interested party provision which will provide online information which franchisors and others may use to check that the integrity and security of important business names can be monitored.
There are likely to be some procedural difficulties when the new national system is introduced in particular as the system relies exclusively on access via the World Wide Web. Some access facilities are likely to be established within ASIC offices and the offices of the Australian Taxation Office.
The new national business name registration system is a welcome improvement on the cumbersome and expensive State by State registration system. The introduction of an online format will significantly reduce the costs of registration which will now be less than for an individual State business name.
Businesses should carefully review their current business names and ensure that they are current and fully paid as there is significant advantage in having these names rolled over into the national system. If a business accidentally allows a State registered business name to lapse prior to the introduction of the national system, it may then, under the national system be impossible to re-register that business name due to conflicts with other State business names that have rolled over into the national system. Equally, if a business has previously looked at the opportunity of having a national business name but has rejected it as a consequence of there being interstate conflicting business names, prompt registration of a State business name in a State where there is no conflict will then allow a national registration of that same name nationally in April 2011.
At present the new legislation does not consider business name squatting. When considering national business name registrations it is important to also co-ordinate these activities with the use of trade marks and internet domain names which combined with national business names should significantly increase the value of goodwill of a business operating in Australia and to register to monitor that no one registers a name that is already registered to you so you have time to challenge the registration.
About Alan Branch
Alan is an experienced consultant, commercial lawyer and franchise expert recognised for his skill in negotiating and completing business set up and expansion projects.
Phone (0) 4133 524 134
Got a question to ask?
Robert Toth - Wisewould Mahony
Robert Toth is a Franchise Partner at Wisewould Mahony Lawyers and an accredited Business Law Specialist with over 25 years experience as a business lawyer and consultant acting for Australian Franchisors looking to expand overseas and International Franchisors establishing business in Australia & New Zealand.
Corinne Attard - Holman Webb Lawyers
Corinne is a franchising and retail specialist with more than 25 years franchising and retail industry experience including extensive in-house experience as general counsel with responsibility for over 350 franchised stores. Corinne's approach is outcome oriented and risk management based and combines practical business advice with legal solutions. She acts for primarily retailers, franchisors, master franchisees and multi-unit franchisees.
Greg Hipwell - Norton Rose
Greg has extensive experience advising companies that distribute goods and services through a network or who exploit brands, technology or intellectual property. He has specific experience in trade practices law, particularly in relation to pricing, supply and market conduct issues and the Franchising Code of Conduct.
Bruce McGregor - Herbert Geer Lawyers
Bruce is a Partner of Herbert Geer Lawyers and is the national head of the Property - Franchising and Leasing team. He has practiced for over 20 years. Bruce provides franchising advice and guidance in Australia and New Zealand, acting for a number of well known prominent state, national and overseas franchisors, franchisees and master franchisees
Peter McLaughlin - redchip lawyers
Peter is a partner of redchip lawyers and heads the franchising and distribution team. He has over 15 years franchising and commercial law experience. He has presented papers on franchising at legal education seminars and workshops, and at public information nights regarding franchising, property and business related issues.
Judith Miller - DLA Piper Australia
Judith Miller is a partner in the Sydney office of DLA Piper Australia and heads the Sydney franchise practice. Her franchising expertise includes advising local and international businesses on the establishment of regional and national franchise systems, and providing strategic advice to established operations.